But I have questions regarding consistency. Here’s what Margarita, one of the most experienced Icons8 designers, says: “In general, new icons are OK, and there are some beautiful ones. Some icons are detailed better than the others. It’s hard to argue with this opinion as some icons really do look better than the others.īut that’s not just due to the vague skeuomorphic interpretation or squirkles. “There’s no consistency - icons are all over in place.” It’s no surprise that some icons look better within a squircle, and others not so much.īoth skeuomorphism and IOSification tend to influence the newest icons in a major way however, their impact is not uniform, and some icons do look better than the others.Īt the same time, the question of consistency is a major point of concern. At the moment, however, Big Sur doesn’t operate on any touch devices, so the argument doesn’t fly.” Hence why the Big Sur icons are placed within circled boxes or so-called squirkles.”Īs Alexander notes, “The approach is common for iOS devices where users need larger icon zones to ease clicking and touching. App icons combine a rounded-rectangle shape, a front-facing perspective, and a consistent drop shadow to provide a unified visual experience.”Īs Alexander, Icons8 senior icon designer, puts it, “Perhaps Cupertino designers decided to standardize all the icons to help users feel more comfortable within the Apple ecosystem. “In macOS 11, the design language for app icons promotes consistency with all platforms while retaining the lifelike rendering style typical of macOS icons. Here’s a snippet from Apple’s Big Sur documentation: ![]() In its current form, the new skeuomorphic movement is branded as neuomorphism, as it merges elements of flat design (clean, simplistic shapes) and skeuomorphism (shadows, lights, depth) without leaning too much on either side.Īnother trend that inspired the latest icons collection is the IOSification, or Cupertino designers’ desire to bring all Apple devices to a common design standard. The switch to skeuomorphism, a more detailed approach to designs with inspiration drawn from real-world objects, has been coming for some time as we’ve lived in a world of a minimalistic flat design for far too long. To understand why Big Sur icons look the way they do, you need to realize two driving forces behind their creation: a skeuomorphism and IOSification. īut we’ll get to the issue of consistency later. Technically speaking, not all of them look terrible, but some look definitely better than the others, which raises more questions about icons’ consistency. Let’s go through all the common opinions surrounding Big Sur icons, one by one. ![]() ![]() ![]() Seeing that there’s no common ground among Apple users, we reached out to professional icon designers to learn what they think about the newest Big Sur icons.Īre Big Sur icons a major design flop that needs to be forgotten as soon as possible, or are they part of a larger vision that Apple intends to follow in the next several years? But one of the most controversial and heated debates rose around Big Sur icons. The new system sparked many discussions and debates concerning the major user interface overhaul it delivered. If you want to search for and download specific icons I highly recommend visiting November 12, 2020, Apple released its newest operating system, Big Sur. You can also download the icons as high-resolution png files. For example, icons (and app names) that start with A and B are clubbed together as a single file. The icon file names have the app names and each zip file will have app icons that start with two or more letters. To avoid huge file sizes and easier downloads, I have split the icons based on their starting letter. icns format (which is used for macOS icons) and also as high-res PNG files (1024 x 1024).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |